3-hour CE course for Arizona real estate agents

What every agent needs to knowAppraisal 101

Ryan Campbell, SRAChief Appraiser & Owner, OnPoint Appraisals (since 2007)
Phoenix Chapter President, Appraisal Institute
ryan@onpointappraisals.com

UAD 3.6: the biggest change to residential appraisals since 2005

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have redesigned the Uniform Residential Appraisal Report (URAR).

Key industry milestones: August 6, 2026, September–October 2026, and November 2, 2026.

What changes

  • The 1004, 1073, and five other legacy forms are retired.
  • One dynamic URAR replaces all legacy residential report types.
  • More granular data: room-level conditions and energy efficiency.
  • Mandatory for all Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac submissions on November 2, 2026.
  • Appraiser software must support UAD 3.6, so turn times may increase during the transition.
1

The basics

Wait… what does that actually mean?

Market value vs. market price

These get used interchangeably, but they answer different questions.

Market value

What should it sell for?

The most probable price a property should bring in a competitive and open market.

Not one transaction. An analysis of the market: comp sales (3+ properties) → market analysis → opinion of value. Estimated through analysis. This is where the appraiser comes in.

Contributory value

What actually moves the needle on price.

  • Size
    • Above-grade finished area Formerly GLA / gross living area. Term retired under UAD 3.6.
    • Below-grade finished area Formerly “basement.” Term retired under UAD 3.6.
  • Location (site value)
  • Quality of construction / upgrades (kitchen, flooring, bathrooms)
  • Bedroom and bathroom counts
  • Pool: contributory value requires market support, not assumption.

Marketability

Related to contributory value, but not the same. It generally moves days on market, not price.

  • Condition
  • Floor plan
  • Grade level of finishes
  • Paint
  • Repairs
  • Landscape amenities
  • Nearby adverse factors (railroad tracks, airports)
  • Positive factors (park, common area, etc.)
  • Pool*

Comparable selection advice

Recency, support, and competition, in that order.

  1. Recent sales: 1–2 sales within 90 days of the effective date. Ideally a 30-day sale is available.
  2. Support the contract price: 1–2 additional sales that support the contract price or provide a similarity comparison.
  3. Active or pending listing: 1 listing or pending. Listings reflect the concept of substitution; they cap value.

Best approach for agents: find 1–2 very similar sales and one very similar competing listing. Limit comps beyond 1 mile or 6 months to 1–2, and only if necessary for similarity.

Comparable selection & consideration

Bracketing, amenities, and what not to do.

  • Support the contract price. Have at least 1–2 sales that support it, ideally more than one.
  • Bracket amenities. Comps with AND without similar amenities are necessary. Do not make across-the-board adjustments.
  • Special sale types. Cash, iBuyer, estate, and distress sales require consideration. Use conditionally and weight them less in reconciliation.
Back to top
2

The nerdy stuff

Now we do math.

Supporting appraisal adjustments

There’s more than one recognized way to support an adjustment.

  • Data analysis techniques e.g., paired data and group data analysis
  • Statistical analysis e.g., graphic and scenario analysis
  • Cost-related adjustments e.g., cost to cure, depreciated cost, market extraction
  • Capitalization of income differences
  • Trend analysis
  • Relative comparison analysis
  • Ranking analysis
  • Personal interviews

Source: The Appraisal of Real Estate, 14th Edition, Chapter 19.

You don’t need to memorize these. Just know that “the appraiser’s opinion” is backed by a stack of specific, checkable methods.

Paired sales analysis

One pair is a data point. A group of pairs is a pattern.

Try it: using the sales below, what are the adjustments for size and view? Isolate one variable at a time: find two sales identical except for the one characteristic you’re testing.

Swipe the table sideways to see every column.

SaleSale priceDateAbove-grade SFAgeView
1$950,000Current2,00010No
2$1,020,000Current2,00010Yes
3$1,125,000Current2,50010Yes
Show the solution

Size adjustment: $105,000 ($210/SF). Pair sales 2 and 3: same view, only size differs. $1,125,000 − $1,020,000 = $105,000 for a 500 SF difference.

View adjustment: $70,000. Pair sales 1 and 2: same size, same age, only view differs. $1,020,000 − $950,000 = $70,000.

Cost as a starting point

Cost of the amenity ≠ value.

Pool cost → less depreciation → contributory value. Age, condition, and remaining useful life all determine how much of the original cost still shows up in the price today.

The takeaway: this is the conversation to have before a seller assumes their $75,000 pool adds $75,000 to the price.

Pool example: Scottsdale paired sale

Find two nearly identical sales differing by one feature. The price difference is your evidence.

Two 4-bed, 2-bath, 2,400 SF homes, one without a pool and one with. The $45,000 pool difference is one clean data point of market evidence.

Pool example: grouped data across three cities

Real ARMLS closed single-family sales, close of escrow 09/01/2025–09/01/2026.

Swipe the table sideways to see every column.

CityAvg sold, no poolAvg sold, poolPool gapAvg $/SF no pool / poolCumulative DOM no pool / pool
Scottsdale$979,380$1,032,091$52,711$417 / $43278 / 72
Gilbert$625,357$671,495$46,138$261 / $27673 / 64
Surprise$443,077$467,099$24,022$219 / $23198 / 69

Search ranges: Scottsdale 2,000–3,000 SF, $750K–$1.35M; Gilbert 2,000–3,000 SF, $500K–$900K; Surprise 1,600–2,600 SF, $350K–$650K. Average size was nearly identical within each city. Source: ARMLS, report prepared by Ryan Campbell 09/22/2026. All information should be verified by the recipient and is not guaranteed as accurate by ARMLS.

Notice the pattern: the pool gap shrinks as the price point drops, and pool homes sold faster in all three cities.

Scottsdale pool adjustment: market data meets the grid

Comp 3 is the only sale without a pool, so it’s the only one that gets a pool adjustment.

Swipe the table sideways to see every column.

FeatureSubjectComp 1Comp 2Comp 3
Sale price—$1,040,000$1,025,000$985,000
Living area (SF)2,4002,4102,3902,400
Bed / bath4 / 24 / 24 / 24 / 2
PoolYesYesYesNo
Pool adjustment—00+$50,000
Adjusted sale price—$1,040,000$1,025,000$1,035,000

After +$50,000, Comp 3 adjusts to $1,035,000, right between Comps 1 and 2. The pool line closes the gap; no other line moves.

Comp figures are illustrative for teaching.

Finalizing the adjustment

No single method carries the whole conclusion. The appraiser reconciles all of them.

Cost / depreciation~$40K$75K pool ≠ $75K in value
Paired sales$45,000Isolated, direct market evidence
Group data$52,711Broader confirmation across many sales
Market reaction$50,000How the market responds to the feature
$50,000Final adjustment, reconciled in the grid and backed by more than one line of evidence.
Back to top
3

The real-world stuff

Because houses are never simple.

Price per square foot: gross vs. net

Gross $/SF tells you the market. Net GLA tells you the adjustment.

Net GLA adjustment

The grid line item. The adjustment for square footage alone, isolated from the other value drivers already accounted for in the grid.

Mark Ratterman methodology

Net GLA adjustment ≈ one-third of gross $/SF. Example: $225/SF gross (neighborhood average, rounded) ÷ 3 = $75/SF net. A reasonableness check, not a formula to apply blindly.

Swipe the table sideways to see every column.

FeatureSubjectComp 1Comp 2Comp 3
Sale price—$670,000$650,000$590,000
Sale date—Apr 2026Mar 2026Jan 2026
GLA (SF)2,8502,7802,9102,750
Gross $/SF—$241.01$223.37$214.55
Lot adjustment—+$5,000−$5,000+$2,500
GLA adj. ($75/SF)—+$5,250−$4,500+$7,500
Pool adjustment—00+$50,000
Total net adjustment—+$10,250−$9,500+$60,000
Adjusted sale price—$680,250$640,500$650,000

GLA math: Comp 1 (2,850 − 2,780) × $75 = +$5,250. Comp 2 (2,850 − 2,910) × $75 = −$4,500. Comp 3 (2,850 − 2,750) × $75 = +$7,500. Conclusion: $75/SF is a reasonable net rate. It is supported by the market data, and the adjusted sale prices ($640,500 to $680,250) bracket the subject.

Solar systems: owned, financed & leased

The panels may look the same. The ownership doesn’t.

Owned / financed

  • Value is based on market reaction, not simply what was paid for it.
  • If a loan exists, the value doesn’t automatically come with it.

Listing a home with solar? Get these three things: system size (kW / production capacity), year installed (age matters), and original system cost (useful context, but not the same thing as value).

VA & FHA/HUD standards

The 3 S’s: safety, soundness, security.

Safety

  • Green pool (applies to conventional loans too)
  • Security bar safety release
  • Plumbing fixtures / water pressure

Security

  • Functional exterior doors and locks
  • Security features / emergency egress
  • Electrical hazards

Effective Realtor-to-appraiser communication

Confirm the sale price. Provide the full contract.

  • Contracts: make sure the appraiser has the correct sale price, contract, and all addendums.
  • Improvements: a list of improvements that includes the cost and the year each was made.
  • Comparables: suggest comps if you’d like, but please limit to 3–4 sales.

The sample improvements list in class itemized a 2023 remodel ($144,609) plus other recent upgrades (A/C, garage door openers, security door, pool waterline tile) for a grand total of $157,609. Each line shows cost, description, and year.

Reconsideration of value (ROV)

A reconsideration only works if one of these three conditions is met.

  • Subject property: there is a factual error or omission about the subject that, when corrected, would affect the appraiser’s opinion of value.
  • Comparable sale: there is a factual error or omission about a comp used in the report that, when corrected, would affect the opinion of value.
  • Recent sales: there are recent comparable sales not considered in the report. Recent means closed within 90 days prior to the date of inspection.
Back to top
4

The “so what?”

Let’s put it all together.

Maricopa County market snapshot

Not to scare you. To prepare you.

The market is sending signals. Rates are still elevated, sales volume has pulled back, days on market are climbing, and new construction with zero down plus builder incentives increases the risk of negative equity.

  • Seller concessions: additional loan pressure
  • Current rates: still elevated
  • Construction: slowing
  • 0% down: risky choice
  • Sales volume: lower volume, higher DOM

Key terms

Quick reference for today’s vocabulary.

Market value
The most probable price a property should bring in a competitive and open market. An analysis, not a single transaction.
Market price
The actual price agreed upon by a specific buyer and seller in a specific transaction.
Contributory value
What a feature adds to overall value as measured by the market, not what it cost.
Marketability
How readily a property sells. Tends to affect days on market more than price.
Above-grade finished area
Finished living space at or above ground level. UAD 3.6 term replacing GLA (gross living area).
Below-grade finished area
Finished space below ground level. UAD 3.6 term replacing “basement.”
UAD 3.6 / URAR
The redesigned Uniform Residential Appraisal Report and dataset. One dynamic report replaces the 1004, 1073, and other legacy forms.
Concept of substitution
A buyer won’t pay more than the cost of an equally desirable substitute, which is why active and pending listings cap value.
Bracketing
Using comps both above and below the subject for a feature (e.g., with and without a pool) so the subject falls within the range.
Paired sales (paired data) analysis
Comparing two sales that are alike except for one feature. The price difference indicates that feature’s value.
Group data analysis
Comparing averages across many sales with and without a feature to confirm what paired sales show.
Depreciated cost
What an item cost new, less loss in value from age, wear, and remaining useful life.
Reconciliation
Weighing several indications (cost, paired sales, group data, market reaction) to reach one supported conclusion.
Gross price per square foot
Sale price ÷ GLA. Blends every value driver together; a sanity check, not an adjustment.
Net GLA adjustment
The grid adjustment for square footage alone, after other features are adjusted separately.
Ratterman method
A reasonableness check that a net GLA adjustment is roughly one-third of the neighborhood’s gross $/SF.
The 3 S’s
VA and FHA/HUD minimum property standards: safety, soundness, and security.
Reconsideration of value (ROV)
A formal request for the appraiser to review a factual error or omission, or recent sales not considered.

Q&A notes

Your notes save on this phone as you type.

Stay connected

  • Join the monthly newsletter at onpointappraisals.com
  • Like and follow OnPoint Appraisals on Facebook and Instagram
  • Leave a Google review for this class

Ryan Campbell, SRA · OnPoint Appraisals
1490 S. Price Road, Ste 109B, Chandler, AZ 85286
ryan@onpointappraisals.com